Skip to content
EN · US Get the Daily Mobile Brief
LON · BLR · NYC · SGP

Phone Comparisons

Phone Comparisons,
Decided in the Lab.

Two flagships walk into our Shoreditch press yard. One walks out with the verdict. Every head-to-head on LG Mobile Lover is built from a calibrated Konica Minolta display analyzer, a Rohde & Schwarz radio tester, and six hours of real-world battery and low-light camera work — never a copy-paste of a press kit.

Updated this week 6 min read
Two flagship smartphones photographed for a side-by-side comparison

Side-by-Side Format

Three phones, one verdict.

Every comparison on this page follows the same template: a verdict score out of 10, a bench-tested spec table, a Geekbench bar, and a single-sentence "best for" tag. Here's the format in full.

Pixel 9 Pro smartphone

Google

Pixel 9 Pro

8.7 / 10
Best for camera purists
Geekbench 6 multi
4,820
Display nits (peak)
2,700
Battery, video loop
22h 10m
Low-light camera score
92 / 100
Full verdict →
iPhone 16 Pro smartphone

Apple

iPhone 16 Pro

8.6 / 10
Best for video creators
Geekbench 6 multi
7,810
Display nits (peak)
2,460
Battery, video loop
20h 45m
Low-light camera score
89 / 100
Full verdict →
OnePlus 13 smartphone

OnePlus

OnePlus 13

8.7 / 10
Best for raw performance
Geekbench 6 multi
9,250
Display nits (peak)
4,500
Battery, video loop
27h 05m
Low-light camera score
81 / 100
Full verdict →

All scores are measured in-house within 72 hours of a device's global launch on a calibrated Konica Minolta CA-410 display analyzer and a Rohde & Schwarz CMW500 radio tester.

Tested, Not Paraphrased

Why our verdicts are different.

  • 11,400+

    Phone models in our database

    From 210+ manufacturers, LG and Samsung to Tecno and Infinix.

  • 42

    Retailers monitored hourly

    Amazon, Best Buy, Flipkart, Carphone Warehouse, Lazada, JD and more.

  • 14,200+

    Reviews, comparisons & buyer guides since 2017

    Written by 34 full-time editors, testers and engineers.

  • 380+

    Citations by Verge, Engadget, Android Authority, GSMArena, Tom's Guide

    Trusted as a secondary source by the publications you already read.

Methodology

How we score a comparison.

A verdict on this page is the average of four lab-measured pillars and one editorial pillar. No spec sheet is pasted; every score is generated within 72 hours of a device's global launch.

  1. 01

    Display — peak nits, ΔE, PWM

    We measure peak brightness, colour accuracy against DCI-P3, and pulse-width modulation at minimum brightness with a Konica Minolta CA-410. A panel that pushes 2,500+ nits but flickers at 240Hz scores lower than a steadier 1,800-nit panel.

  2. 02

    Performance — Geekbench 6 & sustained thermals

    Single-run Geekbench scores lie, so we run a 20-minute sustained-throttle loop on every flagship. The score we publish is the median of the final five minutes, not the headline peak.

  3. 03

    Battery — video loop & 5G drain

    Standardised 1080p video at 200 nits over Wi-Fi, then a parallel 5G drain test under a Rohde & Schwarz CMW500 cell emulator. mAh ratings are not the score — endurance at a fixed brightness is.

  4. 04

    Camera — low-light & motion

    A locked tripod, a 1-lux controlled scene, and a moving subject at 0.5 lux. We score detail retention, noise, and shutter lag against a reference unit. Computational claims are checked, not paraphrased.

  5. 05

    Editorial pillar — fit for life

    Software longevity promises, repairability, carrier support, and one-handed usability. This is the only pillar a human scores — and the only one a sponsored unit can never alter under our no-paid-review policy.

Comparison Alerts

One email, the moment a compared phone drops $25+.

Pick the matchups you care about. We'll ping you when either side of a head-to-head hits a new low at any of 42 retailers we monitor hourly. No daily roundups, no clickbait, one-click unsubscribe.

Read by 610,000+ subscribers. 38% average open rate, 2.4× the media-industry benchmark.